🔗 Share this article

A decade after the UK entered into a hurried referendum that divided the country and triggered disorder, a caution is issued from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and citizens drifted into Brexit and the identical might transpire with a national vote on a united Ireland, triggering disturbances for which nobody is prepared.

That conveys the caution from two prominent commentators from either side of the Irish border who have teamed up to scrutinise the pros and cons of Northern Ireland exiting the UK to form a fresh nation with the Republic of Ireland.

Administrative Structures Not Ready

Fintan O’Toole and The Northern Ireland editor, have determined that the administrative systems in Ireland and Britain are extremely unready for a potentially tense and monumental referendum.

"The crucial insight of Brexit remains unheeded, which is that developments can arise suddenly and can gather momentum very quickly," the commentator said. "I would suggest that the institutional structure of our region remains highly fragile."

Book Publication Aims to Stir Debate

The duo have analysed the political, economic and cultural rationales for any governmental shift in a volume, The Case For and Against Unification, released by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.

They aim to encourage dialogue on the matter with a roadshow of speaking events that will bring them to Westminster soon.

"What troubles everybody, or should haunt every person, is the Brexit referendum of 2016," said the analyst.

"We do not want a referendum on a yes-no, vague proposition whose implications have not been spelled out because then you end up with an highly divided society where people who have lost are unable to accept losing and the victorious side are uncertain quite what it is that they have achieved."

Constitutional Provision

Under the Belfast Agreement, the Northern Ireland official is obliged to schedule a public vote on Irish unification if it seems probable that a most voters would approve.

Sinn Féin and other nationalists argue that moment is approaching, and a group called pro-unification advocates has built momentum, but both governments and unionists downplay the likelihood, making it uncertain if and when there could be a referendum.

Insufficient Serious Debate

Ideological statements for and against unification has masked the shortage of serious debate, stated the journalist.

"People tend to be supportive or opposed the notion but the actual thinking which could extend past that to realise it hasn't for the most part happened. Much has taken place in academia but very few politicians or advocates want to engage even with the essentials. To illustrate, what sort of state should be desired? Centralised? Federal?"

Publication's Method

In the volume, neither author advocates unification or the existing arrangement. Each authors two essays that aim for objectivity in presenting the argument for a united Ireland and the case opposing it, assembling financial and social data, historical precedents and structural examples.

Arguments encompass national emblems, duties, medical care, retirement funds, sovereign debt obligations and the danger of unionist unrest. The goal is to inform and provoke dialogue.

"There's huge interest in the issue but there hasn't quite been a discussion," said the writer. "Discussion implies an recognition of the idea that there could be good arguments on either side."

Parallel Votes

A referendum in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the republic, where the electorate claim they support unity but reject increased taxation or introducing a new flag to reflect unionists' UK heritage.

"The Irish government does need to establish what the proposal from pro-unification movements is beyond just saying: 'We seek a unified Ireland and we value you'," stated the commentator.

Probability of Referendum

McBride considers a referendum in his lifetime is probable and that it might occur suddenly. "It is possible just a irresponsible or a ill-advised or a incompetent secretary of state who says: 'We should proceed and get it out of the way.'"

Each of the pro-unification advocates and pro-UK supporters have plausible, valid arguments, he commented. "One side will succeed in this matter and somebody will ultimately lose but both parties has got something to learn from the other's viewpoints."

Appeal for More Extensive Dialogue

Westminster needed to join the dialogue, said the analyst. "This is about Britain. It is a British question equally as it is an Irish issue."